Listen to this post: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Every business—just like every blog—makes a choice early on: Who will we serve?
Most don’t even realize they’re making it.
But that choice, conscious or not, determines everything that follows.
Helzberg Diamonds and Zales both sold jewelry to middle America. Both started as family businesses. But they made radically different bets on who they would serve—and those bets shaped everything after: margins, marketing, real estate, even how their people saw themselves.
This isn’t a story about diamonds. It’s a story about choices.
What happens when you choose your customers—versus letting your customers choose you?
Certified Perfect
Barnett Helzberg Sr. made a decision that seemed crazy at the time: he would only sell “Certified Perfect” diamonds—flawless stones with top-end color and cut. No exceptions.
In the 1930s, about 20 years before the Gemological Institute of America formalized modern diamond grading, Helzberg Sr. introduced the Helzberg Certified Perfect Diamonds program to stand out in a commoditized market. He refused to sell diamond solitaires unless they met his exacting standards: flawless under 10x magnification, top-tier color (D–F range), ideal proportions for maximum brilliance, and absolute clarity.
The inspiration came from an unlikely place—a baking soda box that proclaimed it was “certified to be perfect.” But the conviction came from somewhere deeper: Helzberg believed love deserved the finest, even for couples of modest means. “You owe your bride the best,” he told customers.
This policy built trust and loyalty, but it came with real constraints. Customers got smaller diamonds for the same budget, and inventory was often scarce.
It also meant Helzberg had to work harder than competitors—procuring, grading, and hunting for inventory that met his exacting specifications.
Still, the strategy paid off. Revenue reached roughly $550M across 150 stores—about $3.7M per store. But the real win wasn’t the numbers. It was what the choice did to the company itself.
Associates beamed, sold with confidence and pride, knowing they had unmatched quality. The positioning built mutual respect—for customers who weren’t used to being treated as deserving of perfection, and for the store, which could hang its hat on that standard. They stood for something more than a transaction.
And it gave the sales team a powerful line:
“You don’t have to buy at Helzberg’s—but make sure you get a perfect diamond.”
Nobody else carried them. That clarity of purpose created differentiation you couldn’t price-shop.
They didn’t compete in the diamond market. Instead, they created something new. The perfect diamond market.
But conviction has costs.
When marquise-cut diamonds meeting the “Certified Perfect” criteria became unavailable for nearly two years, Helzberg stores couldn’t fulfill requests. Helzberg Jr. begged his father to relax the rule. His father refused. Lowering the standard, he argued, would tell employees and customers that “perfect” was just advertising puffery—that their promise could bend when convenient. They would be abandoning the market they had created.
He adapted instead—finding new cuts, educating customers on alternatives—but never compromised the core standard.
When “Yes” Becomes the Problem
At my previous consulting firm, we were targeting complex technology systems—the kind of work that required deep expertise and commanded premium rates.
But we had one fatal flaw: we never said no.
When Uber was in hypergrowth, they didn’t have tech work for us, but they did need help collecting abandoned e-scooters and bikes. Someone on our team called it a “foot in the door.”
Any work would do, they reasoned—get the contract, then transition to the good stuff.
Big mistake.
The work was pure logistics—chasing scooters out of alleys and ditches, managing low-wage crews, solving operational chaos we had no systems for.
We weren’t consultants anymore. We were scooter wranglers.
Worse, it killed our positioning. Try walking into a VP’s office to pitch an Oracle ERP implementation when they know you as the scooter guys. You’ve already defined yourself.
We lost money, burned credibility, and had to shut the project down. I left soon after.
We’d learned the lesson that every business eventually learns: the wrong customers don’t just waste your time—they can pull you down market and redefine who you are.
If it looks like a duck…
The Volume Trap
Zales learned the same thing, only at scale.
Founded in 1924, they chased everyone with their famous “penny down, dollar a week” credit plan. Watches, diamonds, fashion jewelry—if it sparkled and could be financed, Zales sold it.
Their strategy was accessibility through credit and promotions: endless 50% off sales, mall locations everywhere, and a broad, middle-market appeal.
The numbers tell the story: about $1.7M in revenue per store—less than half of Helzberg’s—and thinner margins (8% versus Helzberg’s 10–15%). To make up for it, Zales opened more stores, piling up $650M in debt.
When the 2008 recession hit and sales dropped 15%, the house of cards collapsed. Bankruptcy followed.
The company that tried to serve everyone ended up serving no one.
You can’t be all things to all people.
Helzberg chose customers who valued purity over size, meaning over discount. That choice forced excellence: better products, better positioning, better experiences, better customers.
They closed underperforming mall stores, opened upscale standalone locations, and reinforced their premium positioning at every step.
Customer choice isn’t just about sales—it’s about identity.
Zales approved anyone who could fog a mirror for credit.
My firm accepted anyone with a checkbook.
Your customers shape everything—your products, hiring, messaging, even your sense of self.
Helzberg stores felt like proposals, Zales stores felt like clearance sales.
My firm went from strategic advisor in our ambitions to street collector in our actions.
Choose Your Future
Many businesses stumble into their customer base.
Early days and lean times create desperation, so they say yes to whatever pays. Then they wonder why their margins shrink and their brand feels generic.
The smart ones make a conscious choice.
They pick customers who align with who they want to become—not just who they can afford to serve today.
I saw this same principle at Tommy Bahama. I worked there briefly—mail room, steaming clothes, lunch runs—and overheard talk of a lawsuit. Tommy Bahama was going after Costco, who was selling their shirts.
I didn’t get it. What’s the problem?
Turns out, a boutique partner had resold out-of-season inventory to Costco, breaking their agreement.
Tommy Bahama refused to play that game. They would never sell directly to Costco. Having customers toss their carefully designed silk shirts into a cart next to a 5-pound can of queso wasn’t the identity they were building.
Their brand stood for “Life is one long weekend.” And they protected it—fiercely.
Helzberg did the same. He built his future around customers who valued purity and love. The result: sustainable margins, employee pride, and a business Warren Buffett wanted to own. In 1995, Berkshire Hathaway bought the company.
Your customers aren’t just transactions. They’re your trajectory.
Who are you serving? And who do you want to become?
Because in business, who you sell to is who you become.
If you enjoyed this post, please share it with a friend.
What do you think?